US — Federal & State

United States of America

The US has no single federal AI law. Governance is fragmented across executive orders, agency rules, and a patchwork of state legislation. Click a state to explore its specific regulations.

4713FEDERAL
40STATES W/ DATA
AIAI AgentsAI ChipsAI GovernanceAI Governance MarketAI HallucinationAI LeadershipAI LitigationAI OutputsAI-WashingAlgorithmic AccountabilityAlliesAntitrustApplications: Agriculture and resource extractionApplications: Arts, sports, leisure, travel, and lifestyleApplications: Broadcasting and media productionApplications: Business services and analyticsApplications: Construction and field servicesApplications: Consumer goodsApplications: EducationApplications: Energy and utilitiesApplications: Finance and investmentApplications: Government: benefits and welfareApplications: Government: judicial and law enforcementApplications: Government: military and public safetyApplications: Government: other applications/unspecifiedApplications: Manufacturing and process automationApplications: Medicine, life sciences and public healthApplications: Networking and telecommunicationsApplications: Sales, retail, and customer relationsApplications: SecurityApplications: TransportationAutonomous VehiclesBias AuditsBig TechChinaCompetitionConsumer ProtectionContent ModerationContent ProvenanceCopyrightCourt CaseCourt Case DatabaseCourt SanctionsCybersecurityData Privacy & ProtectionDeepfakesDeepfakes & Synthetic MediaDefense & MilitaryDefense & National SecurityEducationElection AIEmployment AIEnforcementExecutive OrderExport ControlsFTCFacial RecognitionFair UseFederal AI CapacityFederal BillFederal LegislationFederal PolicyFinanceFinancial ServicesGenerative AIGovernment AI UseGovernment UseHarms: Detrimental contentHarms: DiscriminationHarms: Ecological harmHarms: Financial lossHarms: Hallucination in legal filingsHarms: Harm to health/safetyHarms: Harm to infrastructureHarms: Harm to propertyHarms: Violation of civil or human rights, including privacyHealth & Life SciencesHealth AIHealthcareHigh-Risk AIIncentives: Access to business opportunitiesIncentives: Civil liabilityIncentives: Criminal liabilityIncentives: FinesIncentives: ImprisonmentIncentives: SubsidiesIntellectual PropertyInternational TradeInteroperabilityJudicial & Law EnforcementLabor & WorkforceLabour LawLegal EthicsLegal LiabilityLegal SanctionsLiability & AccountabilityLicensing & AuthorisationMATCH ActMarket ForecastNISTNational StrategyPolicy ShiftPolitical ContentPolitical InitiativePreemptionProcurementPublic ConsultationRFIRisk factors: BiasRisk factors: Interpretability and explainabilityRisk factors: PrivacyRisk factors: ReliabilityRisk factors: Reliability: RobustnessRisk factors: SafetyRisk factors: SecurityRisk factors: Security: CybersecurityRisk factors: Security: DisseminationRisk factors: TransparencySanctionsSanctions RiskSector-SpecificSemiconductorsSoftware PricingStandardState AI GovernanceState AI LawsState LawsState LegislationState-Federal DynamicsStrategies: ConveningStrategies: DisclosureStrategies: Disclosure: About evaluationStrategies: Disclosure: About incidentsStrategies: Disclosure: About inputsStrategies: Disclosure: Accuracy thereofStrategies: Disclosure: In deploymentStrategies: Disclosure: In standard formStrategies: EvaluationStrategies: Evaluation: Adversarial testingStrategies: Evaluation: Conformity assessmentStrategies: Evaluation: External auditingStrategies: Evaluation: Impact assessmentStrategies: Evaluation: Post-market monitoringStrategies: Governance developmentStrategies: Government study or reportStrategies: Government supportStrategies: Government support: AI workforce-relatedStrategies: Government support: For R&DStrategies: Input controlsStrategies: Input controls: Compute circulationStrategies: Input controls: Compute useStrategies: Input controls: Data circulationStrategies: Input controls: Data useStrategies: Licensing, registration, and certificationStrategies: New institutionStrategies: Performance requirementsStrategies: Pilots and testbedsStrategies: TieringStrategies: Tiering: Tiering based on domain of applicationStrategies: Tiering: Tiering based on generalityStrategies: Tiering: Tiering based on impactStrategies: Tiering: Tiering based on inputsStrategies: Tiering: Tiering based on planning abilityTraining DataTransparencyTrump Administration

State Legislation Map — Click a State

No data
Most active

Federal Regulations & Executive Actions

29 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

AI-Enabled Optimization of Early-Phase Clinical Trials Pilot Program; Request for Information

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or the Agency) is issuing this request for information to solicit input on a proposed pilot program to assess how artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled technologies can improve efficiency, speed, and quality of decision- making in early phase clinical trials. Early-phase clinical trials represent a critical bottleneck in drug development, often characterized by high uncertainty, limited patient populations, and inefficient decision- making processes. This ...

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
24 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

Privacy Act of 1974: Matching Program

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
23 APR 2026 · Executive Order

FTC Amendments to the Children's Online Privacy Protection Rule (COPPA)

On 23 April 2026, the Federal Trade Commission’s (FTC) amended Children’s Online Privacy Protection Rule (COPPA Rule) enters into force. All subject operators are required to comply with the Rule’s provisions by 22 April 2026. Operators must confirm that any mixed audience website or online service does not collect personal information before determining whether a visitor is under 13 years old, unless such collection falls under a permitted exception. Age-screening methods must be designed to...

National Strategyftc.gov ↗
22 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

Notice of Public Meetings of the Maryland Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights

Notice is hereby given, pursuant to the provisions of the rules and regulations of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) and the Federal Advisory Committee Act, that the Maryland Advisory Committee (Committee) to the Commission will hold public meetings via Zoom. The purpose is for the committee to begin briefing planning on the chosen topic of artificial intelligence and its application in voting administration.

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
22 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Citizen Petition from Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC

US federal rulemaking: Citizen Petition from Olsson Frank Weeda Terman Matz PC (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
22 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Unmanned Aircraft System Integration atAirports and Necessary Planning, Design, and Physical Infrastructure Needs

US federal rulemaking: Agency Information Collection Activities; Proposals, Submissions, and Approvals: Unmanned Aircraft System Integration atAirports and Necessary Planning, Design, and Physical Infrastructure Needs (FAA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
20 APR 2026 · Working Paper

Concept Release on Consolidated Audit Trail and Other Audit Trails and Data Sources

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") is publishing this concept release to solicit comments in support of a comprehensive review of the Consolidated Audit Trail and other audit trails and related data sources currently used in the regulation of U.S. securities markets, including comments regarding the funding mechanisms for these audit trails and/or related data sources. There have been several developments since the Commission last evaluated the scope and sufficiency of ...

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
20 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

Privacy Act of 1974; System of Records

In accordance with the Privacy Act of 1974, we are issuing public notice of our intent to discontinue an existing system of records notice entitled, Hearing Office Tracking System of Claimant Cases (60-0010), last published on January 11, 2006.

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
20 APR 2026 · Law / Act

United States - 19 New State AI Laws Enacted

In April 2026, 19 new AI-related laws were enacted across multiple US states including Colorado, Idaho, New York, Oregon, and Tennessee. Laws cover consumer protection, algorithmic accountability, deepfake regulations, automated decision-making transparency, and sector-specific AI use restrictions. The proliferation of state-level AI laws creates a complex patchwork compliance environment for companies operating nationally.

State AI Laws ·Consumer Protection ·Deepfakes ·+1pluralpolicy.com ↗
19 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Citizen Petition from Jonathan H. Bari on behalf of Celiac Journey

US federal rulemaking: Citizen Petition from Jonathan H. Bari on behalf of Celiac Journey (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
18 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Seating Systems

US federal rulemaking: Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards: Seating Systems (NHTSA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
18 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District - Exemption/Rulemaking

US federal rulemaking: Alameda County Mosquito Abatement District - Exemption/Rulemaking (FAA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
17 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

Congress Urged to Pass Stricter AI Export Controls Against China

Dmitri Alperovitch, co-founder of Silverado Policy Accelerator, urged Congress to pass stricter U.S. AI export controls directed at China to maintain American AI leadership amid escalating competition.

Export Controls ·China ·AI Leadershipsilverado.org ↗
16 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

Intent To Request a Revision From OMB of One Current Public Collection of Information: Cybersecurity Measures for Surface Modes

The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) invites public comment on one currently-approved Information Collection Request (ICR), Office of Management and Budget (OMB) control number 1652-0074, abstracted below, that we will submit to OMB for a revision in compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA). The ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its expected burden. The collection concerns data concerning the designation of a Cybersecurity Coordinator; the reporti...

✓ OfficialNational Strategyfederalregister.gov ↗
15 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Working Group 2 - Corrosion Presentations

US federal rulemaking: Working Group 2 - Corrosion Presentations (PHMSA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
13 APR 2026 · Other

Federal Trade Commission lawsuit against Publishing.com over alleged misleading earnings claims

On 13 April 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced it had reached a settlement and issued a proposed consent order against Publishing.com LLC and its principals regarding deceptive marketing of online self-publishing programs. The order requires the company to pay USD 1.50 million to settle charges that it misled consumers with unsubstantiated earnings claims concerning its AI Publishing Academy and Publishing Accelerator services. Under the terms of the agreement, the company mus...

Consumer Protectionftc.gov ↗
13 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria: Secretary's Supplemental Priority and Definitions on Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Education

US federal rulemaking: Priorities, Requirements, Definitions, and Selection Criteria: Secretary's Supplemental Priority and Definitions on Advancing Artificial Intelligence in Education (ED)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
13 APR 2026 · Law / Act

Kentucky HB 692 amending Kentucky Revised Statutes on data privacy including cybersecurity regulation

The Governor of Kentucky signed HB 692 into law, requiring controllers to establish reasonable administrative, technical, and physical data security practices to protect personal data.

✓ OfficialData Privacy & Protection ·Cybersecurityapps.legislature.ky.gov ↗
13 APR 2026 · Court Case

Iowa AG amended case against TikTok asserting China data access risk and addictive design claims

The Iowa Attorney General filed amended petition against TikTok adding claims about addictive design features and deceptive assurances about Chinese data access, seeking permanent injunction and civil penalties.

✓ OfficialConsumer Protectioniowaattorneygeneral.gov ↗
09 APR 2026 · Court Case

Martinez v. OpenAI

Class action complaint alleging harm from AI-generated hallucinated medical advice. Plaintiff alleges reliance on ChatGPT output for health decisions.

Court: U.S. District Court, Central District of CaliforniaParty: Martinez v. OpenAITool: ChatGPT
Health & Life Sciences ·Consumer Protection ·Judicial & Law Enforcement ·+1courtlistener.com ↗
08 APR 2026 · Court Case

In re: AI-Assisted Filing Sanctions

Court imposes sanctions on attorney for submitting AI-generated brief containing multiple fabricated case citations, establishing new precedent for AI use in federal court filings.

Court: U.S. District Court, Southern District of New YorkParty: In re: AI-Assisted Filing SanctionsTool: ChatGPT
⚠ Professional sanction imposed
Judicial & Law Enforcementcourtlistener.com ↗
07 APR 2026 · Policy / Guidance

AI Technology Export Enforcement - Five Warning Signs

Alvarez and Marsal outlined five practical indicators companies should watch to navigate AI technology export controls and sanctions risk, providing enforcement risk guidance for the semiconductor and AI industries.

Export Controls ·Enforcement ·Sanctions Riskalvarezandmarsal.com ↗
07 APR 2026 · Court Case

Doe v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Federal court filing alleging reliance on AI-generated legal research containing fabricated citations in a consumer protection action against Meta Platforms.

Court: U.S. District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaParty: Doe v. Meta Platforms, Inc.Tool: ChatGPT
Judicial & Law Enforcement ·Data Privacy & Protectioncourtlistener.com ↗
05 APR 2026 · Court Case

Thompson v. State of Texas

Defendant appeals conviction arguing defense counsel relied on AI-generated case law that was subsequently found to be fabricated. Court orders new trial.

Court: Texas Court of AppealsParty: Thompson v. State of TexasTool: ChatGPT
Judicial & Law Enforcementcourtlistener.com ↗
04 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels

US federal rulemaking: Food Labeling: Revision of the Nutrition and Supplement Facts Labels (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
04 APR 2026 · National Strategy

U.S.DOT/NHTSA - Final Environmental Impact Statement Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, Model Years 2011-2015

US federal rulemaking: U.S.DOT/NHTSA - Final Environmental Impact Statement Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, Passenger Cars and Light Trucks, Model Years 2011-2015 (NHTSA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
04 APR 2026 · Court Case

Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia

Virginia appellate court addresses admissibility of AI-generated evidence in criminal proceedings, establishing standards for authentication of AI-assisted legal research.

Court: Court of Appeals of VirginiaParty: Johnson v. Commonwealth
Judicial & Law Enforcementcourtlistener.com ↗
03 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Acquisition Regulation: Prohibition on Certain Semiconductor Products and Services

US federal rulemaking: Acquisition Regulation: Prohibition on Certain Semiconductor Products and Services (FAR)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
03 APR 2026 · National Strategy

M14 General Principles on Plan, Design and Analysis of Pharmacoepidemiological Studies That Utilize Real-World Data for Safety Assessment of Medicines

US federal rulemaking: M14 General Principles on Plan, Design and Analysis of Pharmacoepidemiological Studies That Utilize Real-World Data for Safety Assessment of Medicines (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
03 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Citizen Petition from Providence St. Peter Hospital/Centralia Hospital

US federal rulemaking: Citizen Petition from Providence St. Peter Hospital/Centralia Hospital (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
03 APR 2026 · National Strategy

99-10-18 Final Order

US federal rulemaking: 99-10-18 Final Order (DOT)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
03 APR 2026 · National Strategy

Purpose and Content of Use-Related Risk Analyses for Drugs, Biological Products and Combination Products; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

US federal rulemaking: Purpose and Content of Use-Related Risk Analyses for Drugs, Biological Products and Combination Products; Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff (FDA)

✓ OfficialNational Strategyregulations.gov ↗
03 APR 2026 · Court Case

United States v. Farris

Lawyer used Westlaw CoCounsel in proceedings before the CA 6th Cir.. Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | AI-generated quoted commentary attributed to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 cmt. n.1 did not appear in the cited commentary; the court could not locate similar language in any authority. Outcome: Counsel disqualified with no compensation for time served; Briefs locked; Bar Referral; Notice of Opinion.

Court: CA 6th Cir.Party: LawyerTool: Westlaw CoCounsel
⚠ Professional sanction imposed
✓ OfficialJudicial & Law Enforcement ·Generative AI ·Liability & Accountability
03 APR 2026 · Court Case

United States v. Farris

Fabricated: Doctrinal Work | AI-generated quoted commentary attributed to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 cmt. n.1 did not appear in the cited commentary; the court could not locate similar language in any authority. || False Quotes: Case Law | Brief attributed a quotation to United States v. Washington ('simply facilitating the offense without exercising decision-making authority is insufficient') that does not appear in that opinion; the court noted Washington in fact upheld the enhancement. || False Quotes: Case Law | Brief attributed a quotation to United States v. Anthony ('[t]here was no evidence [the defendant] directed or supervised anyone else') that does not appear in the opinion; the court explained Anthony's vacatur was narrow and the defendant had conceded supervisory role.

Court: CA 6th Cir.Party: LawyerTool: Westlaw CoCounsel
⚠ Professional sanction imposed
Harms: Hallucination in legal filings
03 APR 2026

United States v. Farris

Judicial & Law Enforcement ·Generative AI ·Liability & Accountability↗ Link available ↗
02 APR 2026 · Working Paper

AI Enforcement Accelerates as Federal Policy Stalls and States Step In

Despite no single federal AI statute, AI antitrust and consumer protection enforcement is rising in 2026. U.S. agencies rely on existing authorities (Section 5 FTC Act, Sherman Act) to police AI-driven behavior while states push ahead with their own comprehensive AI laws.

Enforcement ·State-Federal Dynamics ·Antitrustmorganlewis.com ↗
02 APR 2026 · Law / Act

MATCH Act - Bipartisan Senate Bill on AI Chip Export Controls

A bipartisan group in the U.S. House led by Rep. Michael Baumgartner introduced the Multilateral Alignment of Technology Controls on Hardware (MATCH) Act to tighten export controls on advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment and AI chips to China.

✓ OfficialExport Controls ·Semiconductors ·China ·+1nbcnews.com ↗
02 APR 2026 · Court Case

Stanford v. Leinart

Pro Se Litigant appeared before the CA Texas. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited a nonexistent opinion "Anderson v. Hood" in his brief; the court found the citation fabricated and likely AI-generated and admonished that citation of nonexistent cases is unacceptable. Outcome: Admonishment.

Court: CA TexasParty: Pro Se Litigant
✓ OfficialJudicial & Law Enforcement ·Generative AI ·Liability & Accountability↗ Link available ↗
02 APR 2026 · Court Case

Kevin D. Turnage v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., et al.

Pro Se Litigant appeared before the D. Arizona. Misrepresented: Legal Norm | Plaintiff purports to quote 29 C.F.R. § 1614.110(b) for a 180-day decision requirement, but that language does not appear; court notes the correct provision is likely 29 C.F.R. § 1614.106(e)(2). Outcome: Warning.

Court: D. ArizonaParty: Pro Se Litigant
✓ OfficialJudicial & Law Enforcement ·Generative AI ·Liability & Accountability↗ Link available ↗
01 APR 2026 · Working Paper

Global AI Governance Market Report 2026

The AI Governance market is forecast to reach approximately $2.63-3.0 billion by 2030, with a CAGR around 35-40%. The market growth reflects the global surge in AI regulation and compliance requirements.

AI Governance Market ·Market Forecast